Section 11 of the IBC states that certain persons are not entitled to make applications for initiating a CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS. These are: (a) a CORPORATE DEBTOR already undergoing a CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS; (b) a CORPORATE DEBTOR that has completed a CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS in the 12 months preceding the date of filing the application;(c) a CORPORATE
An INFORMATION UTILITY is defined in section 3(21) of the IBC as a “person” registered as such with the IBBI under section 210. The primary function of INFORMATION UTILITYs is to provide high quality authenticated information about debts and defaults, making them important from a public policy standpoint. Section 209 of the IBC specifies that no INFORMATION UTILITY can do
In the case of Vijay Kumar Jain vs. Standard Chartered Bank & Ors., the Apex Court held that the members of the suspended Board of Directors of a corporate debtor are vested with right to receive insolvency resolution plans submitted before the resolution professional so that they could effectively participate in the meetings of Committee of Creditors (CoC). The Supreme Court
After many conflicting decisions, the Supreme Court in Mobilox v Kirusa finally settled the issue regarding the interpretation of the term ‘dispute in existence’ under the Code. This provided much-needed relief and clarity to corporate debtors who may have a genuine dispute regarding the debt under consideration, but may not have yet initiated legal proceedings. The Court acknowledged the fact
The objective of the new law is to promote entrepreneurship, availability of credit, and to balance the interests of all stakeholders by consolidating and amending the laws relating to reorganization and insolvency resolution of corporate persons, partnership firms and individuals in a time-bound manner and for maximization of value of assets of such persons and matters connected therewith or incidental
The NCLAT in JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. v. Samay Electronics Pvt. Ltd., the same Bench of the Adjudicating Authority, which passed two conflicting orders, to make a reference to Hon’ble President, NCLT, if not already made, in terms of Section 419 (5) of the Companies Act 2013, for hearing on the issues and points on which the two Members
Section 14 of the IBC prevents the payment of any pre-CIRP dues of a creditor during the moratorium period. The moratorium does not affect the payment of dues/costs arising in the course of the CIRP of the CD. These dues/costs are categorized as “insolvency resolution process costs” (CIRP costs), and to the extent unpaid, are to be given priority for
Individual insolvency and bankruptcy were covered under the two pre-independence legislations: The Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, and the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920. It should be noted that pending notification of the provisions relating to individual insolvency and bankruptcy under the Code, these statutes still continue to apply. For companies, the basic law dealing with their winding up or liquidation
Loan moratorium base- what transpired between the Reserve Bank and The IBC laws Reserve Bank of India has informed the Top Court that borrowers opting for resolution of COVID-related stressed loans shall not be required to submit any specific plans. The Resolution Framework does not require any resolution plan in any form to be submitted to the lending institutions at
JSW Steel Ltd. Vs. Mahender Kumar Khandelwal & Ors.-NCLAT In the CIRP of Bhushan Power & Steel Limited- (Corporate Debtor), the Resolution Plan submitted by JSW Steel Limited (Resolution Applicant) has been approved by the Adjudicating Authority by impugned Judgment dated 5th September, 2019 with certain conditions. After the approval of plan when Monitoring Committee was monitoring the change of
