Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has issued a consultation paper proposing tweaks to the corporate insolvency resolution process. The regulator has put forth four specific proposals which are aimed at reducing delays in the IBC process. In the discussion paper, the insolvency regulator has proposed to impose an obligation on the committee of creditors (COC) to share all
Tag: IBC
YES Bank files insolvency proceedings against Zee Learn
Yes Bank has initiated insolvency proceedings against Zee Learn alleging a default on a financial facility worth Rs. 468 crores, Zee Learn said in an exchange filing on April 25. “The company is compiling information to verify the facts claimed in the said petition filed by Yes Bank Limited,” the filing showed. Yes Bank has filed for bankruptcy under Section
HDFC moved NCLT against SITI Networks
Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd (HDFC) has moved insolvency tribunal NCLT against the country’s leading multi-system operator SITI Networks Ltd for an alleged default of Rs 296 crore.SITI Networks has received a notice issued by the Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal over the petition filed by HDFC, the Essel group firm said in a regulatory filing on
NCLT declares Supertech bankrupt
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) New Delhi, on March 25, 2022 admitted Union Bank of India’s application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to initiate insolvency proceedings against real estate firm Supertech. “We are satisfied that the present application is complete in all respects and the applicant financial creditor (Union Bank) is entitled to claim
India’s largest bulk tea producer McLeod Russel faces insolvency proceedings in NCLT
The McLeod Russel company runs 31 tea gardens in Assam, 2 in Alipurduar and also has gardens in Africa, Vietnam India’s largest bulk tea producer McLeod Russel India Ltd (MRIL) has been admitted for insolvency proceedings on Friday for defaulting on the repayment of a Rs 100 crore loan. The company, promoted by the Khaitan family of Calcutta, operates 31
NCLT orders liquidation of Siva Industries, rejects proposal to withdraw company from IBC
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai, has rejected the debt settlement proposal of Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd that was earlier approved by its lenders. The court also ordered Siva Industries’ liquidation in an order on August 13,2021. The NCLT rejected the proposal terming it a “business restructuring plan” rather than a settlement envisaged under section 12 A of
PERSONS OR ENTITIES BARRED UNDER IBC FROM INTITIATION OF CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS
Section 11 of the IBC states that certain persons are not entitled to make applications for initiating a CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS. These are: (a) a CORPORATE DEBTOR already undergoing a CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS; (b) a CORPORATE DEBTOR that has completed a CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS in the 12 months preceding the date of filing the application;(c) a CORPORATE
THE IMPORTANCE OF INFORMATION UTILITIES
An INFORMATION UTILITY is defined in section 3(21) of the IBC as a “person” registered as such with the IBBI under section 210. The primary function of INFORMATION UTILITYs is to provide high quality authenticated information about debts and defaults, making them important from a public policy standpoint. Section 209 of the IBC specifies that no INFORMATION UTILITY can do
VARIOUS IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS HELD IN IBC, 2016
In the case of Vijay Kumar Jain vs. Standard Chartered Bank & Ors., the Apex Court held that the members of the suspended Board of Directors of a corporate debtor are vested with right to receive insolvency resolution plans submitted before the resolution professional so that they could effectively participate in the meetings of Committee of Creditors (CoC). The Supreme Court
SCOPE OF DISPUTE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE,2016
After many conflicting decisions, the Supreme Court in Mobilox v Kirusa finally settled the issue regarding the interpretation of the term ‘dispute in existence’ under the Code. This provided much-needed relief and clarity to corporate debtors who may have a genuine dispute regarding the debt under consideration, but may not have yet initiated legal proceedings. The Court acknowledged the fact